Blog

  • Cost Segregation and the 2026 Tax Landscape: What UHNWIs Need to Know

    Cost Segregation and the 2026 Tax Landscape: What UHNWIs Need to Know

    Last Updated: 2026

    Key Takeaways

    • The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) , signed July 4, 2025, permanently restored 100% bonus depreciation under I.R.C. § 168(k) for qualified property acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025, reversing the TCJA’s scheduled phase-down that would have reduced the rate from 40% in 2025 to 20% in 2026 and eliminated it entirely by 2027 ().
    • A precise acquisition date threshold governs eligibility: property subject to a written binding contract on or before January 19, 2025, is treated as acquired under prior rules, regardless of when placed in service—for those properties, the applicable bonus rate for most assets placed in service in 2025 is 40% ().
    • The Excess Business Loss limitation under I.R.C. § 461(l) was made permanent by the OBBBA, with 2026 thresholds of $512,000** for joint filers and **$256,000 for single filers—reduced from 2025 levels of $626,000 and $313,000 () .
    • Every cost segregation loss must pass through five sequential gates before it can offset active income: Basis (I.R.C. § 704(d)), At-Risk (I.R.C. § 465), Passive Activity (I.R.C. § 469), Excess Business Loss (I.R.C. § 461(l)), and Net Operating Loss (I.R.C. § 172) ().
    • The Section 179 deduction limit increased to $2,560,000** for 2026, with the phase-out threshold beginning at **$4,090,000 ().
    • A binding purchase price allocation cannot be overridden by a subsequent cost segregation study, as established in Peco Foods, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-18, aff’d 522 F. App’x 840 (11th Cir. 2013) ().

    Direct answer: The 2026 tax landscape for cost segregation is defined by the OBBBA’s permanent restoration of 100% bonus depreciation under I.R.C. § 168(k), the permanent Excess Business Loss limitation under I.R.C. § 461(l), and the permanent Section 179 expensing limit of $2,560,000. For ultra-high-net-worth individuals, the critical planning insight is that these enhanced deductions are only valuable if the resulting losses can clear the five sequential limitation gates—Basis, At-Risk, Passive Activity, Excess Business Loss, and NOL ().

    Introduction

    For ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWIs) investing in commercial real estate, 2026 represents a turning point in depreciation planning. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), enacted July 4, 2025, fundamentally reshaped the tax landscape for real estate investors by permanently restoring 100% bonus depreciation and permanently extending several key business provisions ().

    But the restoration of 100% bonus depreciation does not mean every UHNWI can simply deduct the full cost of reclassified building components in year one. The tax code contains five sequential limitations that a cost segregation loss must pass through before it can offset active income. As one practitioner resource observes: “A cost segregation study that generates $500,000 of accelerated depreciation in year one is only valuable if you can use that deduction. That answer depends entirely on your tax position” ().

    Within the federal tax hierarchy of authority, the 2026 cost segregation landscape is governed by I.R.C. § 168 (depreciation), I.R.C. § 168(k) (bonus depreciation), I.R.C. § 461(l) (excess business loss), and I.R.C. § 469 (passive activity losses)—all primary statutes—interpreted through Treasury Regulations, U.S. Tax Court decisions, and IRS guidance including Notice 2026-11 and the Cost Segregation Audit Technique Guide.

    What Is the 2026 Cost Segregation Tax Landscape?

    Direct answer: The 2026 cost segregation tax landscape is defined by three OBBBA changes: (1) permanent 100% bonus depreciation under I.R.C. § 168(k) for qualified property acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025; (2) the permanent Excess Business Loss limitation under I.R.C. § 461(l) with 2026 thresholds of $512,000** (joint) and **$256,000 (single); and (3) the increased Section 179 expensing limit of $2,560,000 for 2026 ().

    Statutory Basis

    StatuteFunction2026 Status
    I.R.C. § 168(k)Bonus depreciationPermanent 100% for property acquired and placed in service after Jan. 19, 2025 ()
    I.R.C. § 461(l)Excess business loss limitationPermanent; $512,000 joint / $256,000 single ()
    I.R.C. § 179Section 179 expensing$2,560,000 limit; $4,090,000 phase-out ()
    I.R.C. § 469Passive activity loss rulesUnchanged; rental real estate passive per se ()
    I.R.C. § 469(c)(7)Real Estate Professional exception750+ hours and >50% test ()
    I.R.C. § 1400Z-2Opportunity Zone recapture eliminationPermanent beginning Jan. 1, 2027 ()

    Historical Development

    Prior to the OBBBA, bonus depreciation was on a scheduled phase-down under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The rate would have dropped from 60% in 2024 to 40% in 2025, 20% in 2026, and 0% thereafter (). The OBBBA reversed this trajectory entirely.

    The OBBBA also made the Excess Business Loss limitation permanent. Previously, the § 461(l) limitation was scheduled to expire after 2025 (). The legislation adjusted the income threshold for inflation, resulting in a reduction from 2025 levels for 2026: **$512,000** (joint) versus $626,000, and **$256,000** (single) versus $313,000 ().

    Current Scope: The Acquisition Date Threshold

    A critical nuance for 2026 planning is the acquisition date threshold. Property subject to a written binding contract on or before January 19, 2025, is treated as acquired under the prior rules, regardless of when it is placed in service. For those properties, the applicable bonus rate for most assets placed in service in 2025 is 40% (). The acquisition date—not the placed-in-service date—governs eligibility ().

    For self-constructed property, IRS Notice 2026-11 established a component election that allows taxpayers to claim 100% bonus depreciation on individual components of larger self-constructed assets, even if construction on the overall project began before January 20, 2025. A 10% safe harbor determines whether the project is treated as having begun before the effective date ().

    Entity Reference Table

    EntityFull NameTypeRole in This Article
    Internal Revenue CodeTitle 26 of the U.S. CodePrimary authoritySource of all operative rules
    Treasury Regulations26 C.F.R.Primary authorityIRS interpretation of the Code
    One Big Beautiful Bill ActP.L. 119-21Primary legislationEnacted July 4, 2025; permanently restored 100% bonus depreciation
    IRS Notice 2026-11Interim guidance on bonus depreciationSecondary IRS guidanceComponent election for self-constructed property ()
    Cost Segregation ATGIRS Publication 5653 (Rev. 2-2025)Secondary IRS guidanceAudit roadmap; 13 quality elements ()
    U.S. Tax CourtArticle I courtJudicial authorityPrecedential for tax disputes

    Binding Effect and Legal Weight

    Direct answer: The 2026 cost segregation rules are governed by primary authority—the Internal Revenue Code, specifically I.R.C. §§ 168, 168(k), 461(l), and 469—and the OBBBA is primary legislation binding on the IRS, courts, and taxpayers. IRS Notice 2026-11 is secondary guidance that taxpayers may rely upon but that does not bind courts.

    Hierarchical Position

    AuthorityTypeBinding Effect
    I.R.C. § 168(k)Primary (statute)Binds IRS, courts, and taxpayers
    I.R.C. § 461(l)Primary (statute)Binds IRS, courts, and taxpayers
    P.L. 119-21 (OBBBA)Primary (legislation)Binds IRS, courts, and taxpayers ()
    Treas. Reg. § 1.168(i)-7Primary (regulation)Binds IRS, courts, and taxpayers
    Hospital Corp. of America v. Comm’r, 109 T.C. 21 (1997)Primary (judicial)Validates cost segregation
    IRS Notice 2026-11Secondary (IRS guidance)Taxpayers may rely; not binding on courts ()
    Cost Segregation ATG (Pub. 5653)Secondary (IRS guidance)Not binding; used by examiners ()

    The ATG expressly states: “This document is not an official pronouncement of the law or the position of the Service and cannot be used, cited, or relied upon as such” ().

    Who Is Bound?

    • IRS: Bound by the statute, the OBBBA, regulations, and court decisions within the relevant circuit.
    • Courts: Bound by the statute and applicable appellate precedent.
    • Taxpayers: Bound by the statute. A taxpayer who claims 100% bonus depreciation on property that does not qualify—because it was acquired before January 19, 2025, or is subject to a prior binding contract—faces disallowance, back taxes, interest, and potentially a 20% accuracy-related penalty under I.R.C. § 6662.

    Key Authorities and Cases

    Direct answer: The key authorities for the 2026 cost segregation landscape are I.R.C. § 168(k) (permanent 100% bonus depreciation), I.R.C. § 461(l) (permanent excess business loss limitation), P.L. 119-21 (OBBBA), IRS Notice 2026-11 (component election), Hospital Corporation of America v. Commissioner, 109 T.C. 21 (1997) (cost segregation validation), and Peco Foods, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-18 (binding purchase price allocation) ().

    Statutory Authority

    • I.R.C. § 168 — MACRS recovery periods: 5, 7, 15, 27.5, and 39 years ().
    • I.R.C. § 168(k) — Bonus depreciation. Permanently restored to 100% for qualified property acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025 ().
    • I.R.C. § 461(l) — Excess business loss limitation. Permanent under the OBBBA; $512,000 (joint) / $256,000 (single) for 2026 ().
    • I.R.C. § 179 — Section 179 expensing. $2,560,000 limit for 2026; phase-out begins at $4,090,000 ().
    • I.R.C. § 469 — Passive activity loss rules. Rental real estate is passive per se under § 469(c)(2) ().
    • I.R.C. § 469(c)(7) — Real Estate Professional exception. 750+ hours and >50% of personal services in real property trades or businesses ().
    • I.R.C. § 1400Z-2(c) — QOF 10-year basis step-up election. Eliminates depreciation recapture ().

    Treasury Regulations

    • Treas. Reg. § 1.168(i)-7 — Requires asset-by-asset adjustments to basis for MACRS property.
    • Treas. Reg. § 1.469-9(c)(4) — REPS tests applied at the joint return level ().
    • Treas. Reg. § 1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii) — Short-term rental exception: average rental period of 7 days or less ().

    Key Cases

    • Hospital Corporation of America v. Commissioner, 109 T.C. 21 (1997) — The landmark Tax Court decision validating cost segregation. The court held that the definitions of tangible personal property developed during the investment tax credit era remain good law, allowing taxpayers to reclassify building components as personal property ().
    • Peco Foods, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2012-18, aff’d 522 F. App’x 840 (11th Cir. 2013) — A taxpayer was bound by the clear and unambiguous terms of a written purchase price allocation agreement and could not subsequently deviate from it through a cost segregation study. The ATG cites this case as authority that a written allocation is binding on the taxpayer ().

    IRS Guidance

    • IRS Notice 2026-11 (January 14, 2026) — Interim guidance on the permanent 100% bonus depreciation under the OBBBA. Establishes the component election allowing 100% bonus depreciation on individual components of self-constructed property, even if construction began before January 20, 2025. Includes a 10% safe harbor for determining whether a project began before the effective date ().
    • Cost Segregation Audit Technique Guide, IRS Publication 5653 (Rev. 2-2025) — Published February 6, 2025. Outlines the 13 principal elements of a quality cost segregation study (). Important: The ATG predates the OBBBA and does not address permanent 100% bonus depreciation or IRS Notice 2026-16. Practitioners must supplement the ATG with P.L. 119-21 and Notice 2026-16 ().

    Practical Application in Tax Practice

    Direct answer: In 2026, UHNWIs must evaluate cost segregation through five sequential limitation gates: Basis (I.R.C. § 704(d)), At-Risk (I.R.C. § 465), Passive Activity (I.R.C. § 469), Excess Business Loss (I.R.C. § 461(l)), and Net Operating Loss (I.R.C. § 172). A cost segregation study generates the deduction, but the tax position determines whether it can be used ().

    The Five Gates Every Cost Segregation Loss Must Clear

    A cost segregation loss is not a single number that lands on the return. It moves through a sequence of limitations, and any one of them can hold it back. Most cost segregation content focuses on the passive activity rules—but that is only the third gate ().

    GateRuleWhat It LimitsAuthority
    1. BasisI.R.C. § 704(d)Loss cannot exceed basis in the property. For a direct purchase, basis starts with the full price, not just cash down ()
    2. At-RiskI.R.C. § 465Loss limited to amount at risk. Qualified non-recourse financing from banks counts; related-party or seller financing may not ()
    3. Passive ActivityI.R.C. § 469Rental losses are passive by default. Passive losses only offset passive income. REPS or STR exception clears this gate ()
    4. Excess Business LossI.R.C. § 461(l)Caps business losses at $512,000 (joint) / $256,000 (single) for 2026. Excess carried forward as NOL ()
    5. NOLI.R.C. § 172NOL subject to 80% limitation; may offset no more than 80% of taxable income ()

    Case Study Illustration

    A UHNWI purchases a $4 million commercial property. A cost segregation study identifies **$1.5 million** of shorter-life components. With 100% bonus depreciation, the first-year deduction on those components is **$1.5 million**—not $1.5 million spread over five, seven, or fifteen years ().

    But the deduction must clear all five gates:

    GateResult for This UHNWIAmount Usable
    Basis$4M basis; $1.5M loss clears$1.5M
    At-Risk$4M at-risk; clears$1.5M
    Passive ActivityIf passive investor: suspended. If REPS or STR: clears$0 or $1.5M
    Excess Business LossIf non-passive: caps at $512,000$512,000
    NOLRemaining $988,000 carried forward as NOL$0 current

    Bottom line: A $1.5 million cost segregation deduction may result in only a **$512,000 current-year benefit** for a non-passive UHNWI, with the remainder carried forward as an NOL ().

    The REPS and STR Escape Routes

    Real Estate Professional Status (REPS): Under I.R.C. § 469(c)(7), a taxpayer qualifies by spending more than 750 hours per year in real property trades or businesses and devoting more than 50% of personal service time to those activities (). Under Treas. Reg. § 1.469-9(c)(4), the tests are applied at the joint return level, meaning if either spouse qualifies, the couple is treated as real estate professionals ().

    Short-Term Rental Exception: Under Treas. Reg. § 1.469-1T(e)(3)(ii), a property is not a “rental activity” if the average rental period is 7 days or less—or 30 days or less with significant personal services. The activity is then treated as an active trade or business, and if the taxpayer materially participates (commonly 500+ hours, or 100+ hours with no one else participating more), the losses become non-passive ().

    The Acquisition Date Threshold: A Critical Planning Point

    The acquisition date—not the placed-in-service date—governs 100% bonus depreciation eligibility. Property subject to a written binding contract on or before January 19, 2025, is treated as acquired under prior rules, limiting most assets placed in service in 2025 to 40% bonus depreciation ().

    For self-constructed property, IRS Notice 2026-11 provides a component election that allows 100% bonus depreciation on individual components (3-, 5-, 7-, and 15-year items found in a cost segregation study) even if construction on the overall project began before January 20, 2025. The election requires a statement attached to a timely filed return (including extensions) specifying whether the election applies to all or some components (). A 10% safe harbor determines whether the project is treated as having begun before the effective date ().

    Recapture Considerations

    While 100% bonus depreciation provides immediate deductions, it also increases the amount subject to ordinary income recapture under I.R.C. § 1245 upon sale. The recapture rate on § 1245 property can reach 37%, compared to the 25% cap on § 1250 real property (). Most § 1245 assets are not eligible for Section 1031 exchange treatment, which is a critical planning consideration for UHNWIs ().

    However, in an Opportunity Zone structure, the § 1400Z-2(c) election after a 10-year hold permanently eliminates all recapture—both § 1245 and § 1250. The OBBBA made the OZ program permanent beginning January 1, 2027, with a rolling five-year deferral and enhanced rural benefits including a 30% basis step-up and 50% substantial improvement threshold for QROFs ().

    Interaction with Other Authorities

    Direct answer: When the OBBBA conflicts with the pre-2025 TCJA phase-down, the OBBBA controls for property acquired after January 19, 2025. When cost segregation conflicts with a binding purchase price allocation, the allocation controls. When the excess business loss limitation conflicts with non-passive loss treatment, the § 461(l) cap still applies.

    Conflict Scenarios

    1. OBBBA vs. TCJA Phase-Down: The OBBBA permanently restored 100% bonus depreciation, overriding the TCJA’s scheduled reduction to 40% in 2025, 20% in 2026, and 0% thereafter (). However, the acquisition date threshold determines which regime applies: property subject to a written binding contract on or before January 19, 2025, remains under the 40% rate for 2025 placements ().
    2. Cost Segregation vs. Purchase Price Allocation: If the buyer and seller executed a written allocation of the purchase price between personal and real property, that allocation is binding on the taxpayer and cannot be modified by a subsequent cost segregation study. This principle was established in Peco Foods ().
    3. Passive Activity vs. Excess Business Loss: Even after REPS or the STR exception clears the passive activity gate, the § 461(l) limitation caps how much non-passive loss can offset non-business income in a single year. For 2026, the cap is $512,000** (joint) / **$256,000 (single) ().
    4. Bonus Depreciation vs. Recapture: While 100% bonus depreciation provides immediate deductions, it also increases the amount subject to ordinary income recapture under I.R.C. § 1245 upon sale. The recapture rate can reach 37% ().
    5. ATG vs. OBBBA: The Cost Segregation ATG (February 2025) predates the OBBBA and does not address permanent 100% bonus depreciation or Notice 2026-16. The controlling authorities for OBBBA provisions are P.L. 119-21 and Notice 2026-16 ().

    Common Errors and Pitfalls

    ErrorConsequenceAuthority
    Assuming 100% bonus applies to property under contract before Jan. 19, 202540% rate applies; disallowance of excess deduction()
    Ignoring the acquisition date thresholdIncorrect bonus rate applied()
    Claiming cost segregation without clearing the Basis gateDisallowance of deductionsI.R.C. § 704(d) ()
    Assuming REPS clears the § 461(l) gateLosses above $512,000 suspended as NOLI.R.C. § 461(l) ()
    Failing to file the component election for self-constructed propertyLimited to 40% bonus rateNotice 2026-11 ()
    Modifying a binding purchase price allocationBinding on taxpayer; IRS can challengePeco Foods ()
    Ignoring recapture exposure on § 1245 propertyOrdinary income recapture up to 37% upon saleI.R.C. § 1245 ()
    Assuming the ATG covers OBBBA changesMissing controlling authorities: P.L. 119-21 and Notice 2026-16()

    What This Article Does Not Cover

    This article is limited to the 2026 tax landscape for cost segregation as it affects UHNWIs. The following adjacent topics are deliberately excluded:

    • Cost segregation methodology and engineering standards — governed by the Cost Segregation Audit Technique Guide, not by the OBBBA.
    • State-level conformity to bonus depreciation and § 461(l) — many states have not conformed to federal rules, creating separate state tax consequences ().
    • Opportunity Zone 2.0 procedural requirements — including QOF certification, QOZB operating rules, and the 90% asset test.
    • Section 179D energy efficiency deductions — a separate provision with its own phase-out schedule for projects beginning after June 30, 2026 ().
    • Estate planning and basis step-up strategies — a distinct planning area with its own exclusion amounts and valuation rules.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What changed for cost segregation in 2026?

    The OBBBA permanently restored 100% bonus depreciation under I.R.C. § 168(k) for qualified property acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025. It also made the Excess Business Loss limitation permanent under I.R.C. § 461(l) and increased the Section 179 deduction limit to $2,560,000 for 2026 ().

    Does the acquisition date or placed-in-service date control 100% bonus eligibility?

    The acquisition date controls. Property subject to a written binding contract on or before January 19, 2025, is treated as acquired under prior rules, regardless of when placed in service. For those properties, the applicable bonus rate for most assets placed in service in 2025 is 40% ().

    What are the five gates a cost segregation loss must clear?

    Every cost segregation loss must pass through five sequential gates: (1) Basis under I.R.C. § 704(d); (2) At-Risk under I.R.C. § 465; (3) Passive Activity under I.R.C. § 469; (4) Excess Business Loss under I.R.C. § 461(l); and (5) NOL under I.R.C. § 172. Any gate can suspend or limit the deduction ().

    What is the 2026 Excess Business Loss limitation?

    For 2026, the § 461(l) limitation is $512,000** for married filing jointly and **$256,000 for single filers—reduced from 2025 levels of $626,000 and $313,000. Losses exceeding the threshold are carried forward as a net operating loss, subject to the 80% NOL limitation ().

    What is the component election under IRS Notice 2026-11?

    The component election allows taxpayers to claim 100% bonus depreciation on individual components (3-, 5-, 7-, and 15-year items found in a cost segregation study) of self-constructed property, even if construction on the overall project began before January 20, 2025. A 10% safe harbor determines whether the project is treated as having begun before the effective date. The election requires a statement attached to a timely filed return ().

    Conclusion

    The 2026 tax landscape for cost segregation is defined by the OBBBA’s permanent restoration of 100% bonus depreciation, the permanent Excess Business Loss limitation, and the increased Section 179 expensing limit. For UHNWIs, these changes create both opportunity and complexity.

    The key opportunities are:

    • 100% bonus depreciation on 5-, 7-, and 15-year components reclassified through a cost segregation study, for property acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025 ().
    • The component election for self-constructed property, allowing 100% bonus on individual components even for projects that began before the effective date ().
    • Opportunity Zone 2.0 permanence beginning January 1, 2027, with rolling five-year deferral and enhanced rural benefits ().

    The key limitations are:

    • The acquisition date threshold—not the placed-in-service date—governs 100% bonus eligibility ().
    • The Excess Business Loss limitation under § 461(l) caps how much non-passive loss can offset non-business income at $512,000** (joint) / **$256,000 (single) for 2026 ().
    • Recapture on § 1245 property can reach 37% upon sale, and most § 1245 assets are not eligible for Section 1031 exchange treatment ().
    • The Cost Segregation ATG predates the OBBBA and does not address permanent 100% bonus depreciation; practitioners must supplement it with P.L. 119-21 and Notice 2026-16 ().

    For UHNWIs, the 2026 landscape requires a five-gate analysis: a cost segregation study generates the deduction, but the investor’s tax position—basis, at-risk amount, passive activity status, and aggregate business losses—determines whether that deduction can actually be used.

    DISCLAIMER: THIS ARTICLE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE. THE INFORMATION MAY BE OUTDATED AND YOU ARE NOT TO RELY ON IT. CONTACT YOUR PROFESSIONAL TO GUIDE YOU BASED ON YOUR CURRENT SITUATION, OR WHAT MAY APPLY TO PREVIOUS YEARS. THIS ARTICLE IS ONLY MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION AND NOT A SPECIFIC ANSWER. YOU ARE NOT OUR CLIENT AND WE HAVE NOT ADVISED YOU.

    Author Bio

    Alan Goldstein is an Enrolled Agent and researcher with 26 years of experience in federal and state tax controversy. He advises high-net-worth families and closely held businesses on income-shifting strategies, charitable planning, and IRS audit defense.

    Last Updated: 2026

    Internal Linking Suggestions

    • [Internal Link: Cost Segregation Audit Technique Guide]
    • [Internal Link: Passive Activity Loss Rules]
    • [Internal Link: Bonus Depreciation]

    External Linking Suggestions

    Image Alt Text

    • “Flowchart of the five sequential limitation gates a cost segregation loss must clear: Basis, At-Risk, Passive Activity, Excess Business Loss, and NOL”
    • “Timeline showing the OBBBA acquisition date threshold of January 19, 2025, and the 40% vs. 100% bonus depreciation rates”

    Schema Markup Suggestion

    json

    {
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "headline": "Cost Segregation and the 2026 Tax Landscape: What UHNWIs Need to Know",
  "description": "An authoritative analysis of I.R.C. §§ 168(k), 461(l), and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act's impact on cost segregation for ultra-high-net-worth real estate investors.",
  "author": {
    "@type": "Person",
    "name": "Alan Goldstein"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026",
  "dateModified": "2026",
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "[Publication Name]"
  },
  "mainEntity": {
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
      {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "What changed for cost segregation in 2026?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
          "@type": "Answer",
          "text": "The OBBBA permanently restored 100% bonus depreciation under I.R.C. § 168(k) for property acquired and placed in service after January 19, 2025. It also made the Excess Business Loss limitation permanent under I.R.C. § 461(l) and increased the Section 179 deduction limit to $2,560,000 for 2026."
        }
      },
      {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "Does the acquisition date or placed-in-service date control 100% bonus eligibility?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
          "@type": "Answer",
          "text": "The acquisition date controls. Property subject to a written binding contract on or before January 19, 2025, is treated as acquired under prior rules, regardless of when placed in service."
        }
      },
      {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "What is the 2026 Excess Business Loss limitation?",
        "acceptedAnswer": {
          "@type": "Answer",
          "text": "For 2026, the § 461(l) limitation is $512,000 for married filing jointly and $256,000 for single filers. Losses exceeding the threshold are carried forward as a net operating loss."
        }
      }
    ]
  }
}