Title: Phantom Income from Hedge Funds and K-1s

Meta Description: Phantom income from hedge funds and K-1s can create tax without cash distributions. Learn the partnership rules, basis limits, reporting duties, and key authorities.

URL Slug: phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1

Phantom Income from Hedge Funds and K-1s: What HNWIs Must Report but Never Receive

Last Updated: October 2026

Key Takeaways

• Phantom income is generally taxable partnership income allocated to a partner even though the partnership did not distribute equivalent cash.
• A Schedule K-1 reports the partner’s distributive share; it does not determine whether the underlying partnership item is taxable.
• Internal Revenue Code §§ 702, 704, 705, and 706 are central to determining what a partner reports and when.
• A cash distribution generally is not the event that makes partnership income taxable; distributions instead interact with the partner’s outside basis under §§ 731–733.
• Hedge-fund investors should reconcile K-1 allocations, cash distributions, outside basis, capital accounts, prior-year K-1s, and any applicable special allocations before filing.

Introduction

Phantom income from hedge funds and K-1s arises because federal partnership taxation generally taxes a partner on the partner’s distributive share of partnership income whether or not the partnership actually distributes cash. This can produce a substantial tax liability for a high-net-worth individual who received little or no cash from the fund during the year.

The phenomenon is not a special tax imposed on hedge-fund investors. It is a consequence of the partnership tax system.

The Internal Revenue Code generally treats a partnership as a pass-through entity rather than as a taxpayer subject to federal income tax at the entity level. The partnership computes its taxable items, reports them on Form 1065 and Schedule K, and allocates the relevant items among its partners. The partners then report their respective shares.

The IRS expressly states that partners are liable for tax on their shares of partnership income whether or not distributed.

The critical distinction is therefore:

Taxable allocation ≠ cash distribution.

For a hedge-fund investor, that distinction can produce what is commonly called “phantom income.”

The term phantom income is descriptive rather than a defined term in the Internal Revenue Code. It generally refers to taxable income recognized or allocated to a taxpayer without a corresponding current cash payment.

What Is Phantom Income from Hedge Funds and K-1s? Definition and Statutory Basis

Phantom income from hedge funds and K-1s generally means a partner must include the partner’s allocated share of taxable partnership income even when the hedge fund retains the underlying cash or reinvests it rather than distributing it to the partner.

A typical example is straightforward:

• A hedge fund earns $10 million of taxable income.
• An investor owns an economic 10% interest.
• The investor is allocated $1 million of taxable income.
• The fund distributes only $100,000 of cash.
• The investor may nevertheless have to report the $1 million of allocated taxable income.
• The $900,000 difference is the economic source of the investor’s “phantom income” problem.

The exact allocation can be more complicated because partnership agreements may contain special allocations, preferred returns, carried interests, allocations of specific gains and losses, and other provisions.

Definitions

Partnership: For federal income-tax purposes, a partnership is generally a pass-through arrangement under which income, gain, loss, deductions, and credits are allocated among partners rather than taxed to the partnership as a separate income-tax-paying entity. See I.R.C. § 702 and the IRS Form 1065 instructions.

Distributive share: A partner’s distributive share is the partner’s share of partnership income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit determined under the partnership agreement and applicable federal tax rules. See I.R.C. § 704.

Schedule K-1: Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) is the information statement through which a partnership reports each partner’s separate share of partnership income, deductions, credits, and other reportable items. See the IRS Partner’s Instructions for Schedule K-1.

Outside basis: A partner’s outside basis is the partner’s federal income-tax basis in the partnership interest, adjusted under Subchapter K, including for income allocations and distributions. See I.R.C. § 705.

Capital account: A partnership capital account is an accounting measure maintained under applicable partnership-tax rules and the partnership agreement; it is not necessarily the same as a partner’s outside tax basis. The IRS specifically cautions that the Schedule K-1 capital-account information cannot by itself be used to determine adjusted outside basis.

Phantom income: Phantom income is a commonly used tax-planning term for taxable income allocated or recognized without a corresponding current cash distribution; it is not a separately defined category of income under the Internal Revenue Code.

Why the K-1 Can Show Income You Never Received

The fundamental statutory rule is found in I.R.C. § 702. A partner’s distributive share of partnership items is taken into account by the partner, and the character of those items generally carries through from the partnership to the partner.

Treasury Regulation § 1.702-1 makes the rule particularly explicit: each partner must take into account the partner’s distributive share of the specified partnership items whether or not distributed.

The timing rule is reinforced by I.R.C. § 706 and Treasury Regulation § 1.706-1. A partner generally includes the partner’s distributive share for the partnership taxable year ending within or with the partner’s taxable year.

Binding Effect and Legal Weight

The governing statutes and Treasury regulations are primary authorities, while a K-1 is primarily an information-reporting document rather than an independent source of substantive tax law; courts and the IRS apply the underlying Code and regulations to determine the partner’s liability.

Federal Tax Authority Hierarchy

The supplied master prompt identifies the following general hierarchy:

Authority	General legal weight	Who is principally bound?	Precedential value
U.S. Constitution	Highest	Congress, Treasury, IRS, courts, taxpayers	Controlling
Federal statute / Internal Revenue Code	Primary	IRS, taxpayers, courts	Binding unless unconstitutional or superseded
Tax treaty	Primary	United States and treaty jurisdictions, subject to treaty rules	Generally controlling under applicable treaty provisions
Treasury regulation	Primary administrative authority	IRS and taxpayers, subject to judicial review	Generally binding if valid and applicable
Federal court decision	Primary judicial authority	Parties; binding precedent according to court hierarchy and jurisdiction	Binding or persuasive depending on court
IRS revenue ruling	IRS administrative guidance	Generally binds IRS personnel within its scope	Generally not binding precedent on courts
IRS revenue procedure / notice	Administrative guidance	IRS and taxpayers to the extent applicable	Weight varies
Private letter ruling	Administrative determination	Generally only the taxpayer to whom issued	Not precedent for other taxpayers
Tax treatises / articles / commentary	Secondary authority	Generally no one	Persuasive only

This hierarchy requires an important qualification: case-law binding effect depends on the court and jurisdiction, and IRS guidance does not ordinarily have the same precedential status as a statute, valid Treasury regulation, or controlling judicial decision.

For the specific phantom-income question, the central primary authorities are §§ 702, 704, 705, 706, 731, 732, and 733, together with the corresponding Treasury regulations.

What Is and Is Not Binding

• The Internal Revenue Code is primary statutory authority.
• Final Treasury regulations generally have the force and effect of law when validly promulgated under statutory authority.
• Supreme Court decisions bind lower federal courts on controlling questions of federal law.
• A taxpayer’s K-1 does not create the underlying tax liability by itself.
• An IRS publication or instruction can be highly useful evidence of the IRS’s administrative position but does not supersede the Code.
• A taxpayer may have a legitimate reporting dispute when a K-1 is incorrect, incomplete, or inconsistent with the partnership’s actual tax treatment.

Key Authorities and Cases

The principal authorities for phantom income are the partnership allocation, inclusion, timing, and basis provisions of Subchapter K, supplemented by Treasury regulations, IRS reporting instructions, and judicial decisions interpreting partnership taxation.

Statutory Authority

I.R.C. § 702 establishes the principal pass-through rule requiring partners to take into account their distributive shares of specified partnership items. The character of those items generally carries through to the partner.

I.R.C. § 702 — Income and credits of partner

I.R.C. § 704 governs how a partner’s distributive share is determined. Partnership agreements generally control subject to statutory limitations, including the substantial-economic-effect rules.

I.R.C. § 704 — Partner’s distributive share

I.R.C. § 705 governs adjustments to the partner’s outside basis, including increases for the partner’s distributive share of taxable and tax-exempt income and decreases for distributions and allocated losses.

I.R.C. § 705 — Determination of basis of partner’s interest

I.R.C. § 706 generally determines the taxable year in which partnership items are taken into account by the partner.

I.R.C. § 706 — Taxable years of partner and partnership

I.R.C. §§ 731–733 govern the tax consequences and basis effects of partnership distributions. A cash distribution generally does not itself cause gain unless the money distributed exceeds the partner’s adjusted basis, subject to statutory exceptions.

I.R.C. § 731 — Recognition of gain or loss on distribution

I.R.C. § 733 — Basis of distributee partner’s interest

For hedge-fund managers or other persons receiving applicable partnership interests in connection with services, I.R.C. § 1061 may recharacterize certain long-term capital gain as short-term capital gain unless the applicable three-year holding-period requirements are satisfied.

I.R.C. § 1061 — Partnership interests held in connection with performance of services

Treasury Regulations

Treas. Reg. § 1.702-1 is especially important because it expressly provides that each partner takes into account the partner’s distributive share of partnership income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit whether or not distributed.

Treas. Reg. § 1.702-1 — Income and credits of partner

Treas. Reg. § 1.704-1 provides the regulatory framework for determining whether partnership allocations have economic effect and whether the allocations are substantial.

Treas. Reg. § 1.704-1 — Partner’s distributive share

Treas. Reg. § 1.706-1 provides timing rules requiring a partner generally to include the partner’s distributive share of partnership items for the partnership taxable year ending within or with the partner’s taxable year.

Treas. Reg. § 1.706-1 — Taxable years of partner and partnership

IRS Guidance

The IRS’s Form 1065 and Schedule K-1 instructions confirm the practical reporting consequence: partners can be taxable on their partnership income even though the partnership did not distribute that income in cash.

The IRS describes Schedule K-1 as the document used to report each partner’s separate share of partnership income, deductions, credits, and other items.

IRS Instructions for Form 1065

IRS Partner’s Instructions for Schedule K-1 (Form 1065)

The IRS also explains that the K-1 capital-account information should not automatically be treated as the partner’s outside tax basis.

That distinction is particularly important for HNW investors because a taxpayer may have:

• taxable income;
• a K-1 capital-account balance;
• outside basis;
• cash distributions;
• unrealized investment appreciation;
• prior-year suspended or limited deductions; and
• different economic and tax allocations.

Those figures can differ materially.

Key Case Law

United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441 (1973), is particularly relevant because the Supreme Court held that conditions preventing a partner’s immediate receipt of partnership income did not prevent the income from being taxable to the partners once it had been earned and allocated under the partnership arrangement.

United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441 (1973)

In Commissioner v. Culbertson, 337 U.S. 733 (1949), the Supreme Court examined whether an alleged partnership should be recognized for federal income-tax purposes and emphasized examining the parties’ agreement, conduct, capital, services, control, and business purpose.

Commissioner v. Culbertson, 337 U.S. 733 (1949)

Similarly, Commissioner v. Tower, 327 U.S. 280 (1946) addressed the substance of a purported partnership arrangement and whether income was properly attributable to the claimed partners.

Commissioner v. Tower, 327 U.S. 280 (1946)

These cases do not establish a special “hedge fund phantom income” doctrine. Instead, they illustrate the broader federal partnership-tax principles that determine whether income belongs to a partner and whether a purported partnership arrangement should be respected.

Practical Application in Tax Practice

The practical solution to phantom K-1 income is not to omit the income because no cash was received; instead, the taxpayer should reconcile the K-1, partnership return, cash distributions, outside basis, and governing partnership agreement before determining the proper reporting position.

A professional review should ordinarily include:

• Form 1065;
• Schedule K;
• Schedule K-1;
• the partnership agreement;
• amendments to the partnership agreement;
• capital-account information;
• outside-basis schedules;
• prior-year K-1s;
• cash-distribution records;
• subscription and redemption documents;
• investor statements;
• Schedule K-1 footnotes;
• statements attached to the K-1;
• foreign-information reporting where applicable;
• separately stated capital gains and losses;
• investment income and expenses;
• applicable carried-interest information; and
• partnership-level adjustments or amended K-1s.

A Simple Phantom-Income Calculation

Assume an investor has a 10% interest and receives the following allocation:

Item	Amount
Partnership taxable income allocated to investor	$1,000,000
Cash distributed	$100,000
Taxable income reported	$1,000,000
Cash not distributed	$900,000
Economic “phantom income”	$900,000

The investor does not ordinarily report only $100,000 merely because that is the cash received.

The starting point is the $1 million distributive share.

The tax consequences of the actual $100,000 distribution are then considered under the partnership distribution and basis rules.

Why Basis Matters

Section 705 generally increases outside basis for the partner’s distributive share of taxable income.

Consequently, phantom income is not necessarily lost forever from an economic perspective. The taxable allocation can increase the partner’s basis even though the partner received no cash.

For example:

1. Partner begins with $2 million outside basis.
2. Partner is allocated $1 million of taxable partnership income.
3. Outside basis generally increases to $3 million, before other adjustments.
4. Partnership distributes $100,000.
5. The distribution generally reduces basis under the applicable rules.

Thus, the tax system can produce a timing mismatch:

Income is taxed now; the economic cash may remain invested until a later year.

This basis adjustment can become highly important when the investor eventually receives distributions or sells the partnership interest.

Hedge-Fund Planning Issues

Hedge-fund investors should pay particular attention to:

• Tax distributions: Does the partnership agreement require or permit distributions intended to cover partner taxes?
• Distribution policy: Can the fund retain taxable profits for reinvestment?
• Special allocations: Are taxable items allocated differently from economic cash?
• Capital gains: Are gains allocated separately from ordinary income?
• Loss limitations: Are allocated losses currently deductible?
• Basis: Does the investor maintain a reliable outside-basis schedule?
• Redemptions: Does a partial redemption create unexpected gain?
• In-kind distributions: Could marketable securities produce special tax consequences?
• Carried interests: Does § 1061 apply?
• Tiered partnerships: Is the investor receiving a K-1 from an upper-tier partnership that itself receives a K-1?
• Amended K-1s: Did the partnership subsequently change an allocation?
• State taxation: Do state filing and sourcing rules create additional liabilities?

Interaction with Other Authorities

When authorities conflict, a valid higher-level authority controls a lower-level authority; an IRS instruction or K-1 cannot override the Internal Revenue Code, and an administrative position cannot displace controlling judicial precedent or a governing Treasury regulation.

The following framework is useful:

1. Start with the Internal Revenue Code.
2. Review applicable Treasury regulations.
3. Check controlling judicial precedent for the taxpayer’s jurisdiction.
4. Review applicable IRS revenue rulings, revenue procedures, notices, and other guidance.
5. Use IRS forms and instructions to determine administrative reporting mechanics.
6. Use secondary sources to identify issues, not to replace primary authority.

The distinction is important when a taxpayer believes the K-1 is wrong.

A K-1 is evidence of the partnership’s reporting position. It is not itself the statute that creates the tax.

What If the K-1 Is Wrong?

A taxpayer should not automatically accept an obviously incorrect K-1, but the taxpayer also should not simply substitute a preferred tax result without analyzing the partnership return and the rules governing inconsistent treatment.

The partnership-consistency regulations generally require a partner’s treatment of partnership-related items to be consistent with the partnership return, subject to procedures for identifying and resolving inconsistencies.

Treas. Reg. § 301.6222-1 — Partner’s return must be consistent with partnership return

Accordingly, if an investor receives a K-1 that appears materially incorrect, the professional should generally:

• contact the partnership or fund administrator;
• determine what was reported on the Form 1065;
• request a corrected K-1 if appropriate;
• document the discrepancy;
• analyze the consistency rules;
• determine whether an amended return or disclosure is required; and
• preserve documentation supporting the final reporting position.

Audits and Appeals

The partnership audit regime adds another layer of complexity because partnership-level adjustments can affect multiple partners.

I.R.C. § 6221 provides the statutory framework for determining partnership-related items at the partnership level under the centralized partnership audit regime.

I.R.C. § 6221 — Determination at partnership level

For HNW investors, an audit should therefore not be analyzed solely from the individual Form 1040 perspective.

A proper review may require tracing:

Form 1065 → Schedule K → Schedule K-1 → individual return → basis → subsequent distributions or disposition.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do I owe tax on a hedge-fund K-1 when I never received the money?

You may owe tax because partnership law generally taxes your distributive share of partnership income whether or not the partnership distributed the corresponding cash.

The fund may retain cash to purchase additional investments, satisfy reserves, or pursue its investment strategy. The tax law generally does not wait for the cash distribution before taxing the partner’s allocated income.

Can I ignore a K-1 if the hedge fund did not distribute cash?

No; lack of a cash distribution generally does not eliminate the requirement to report a valid distributive share shown on the K-1.

If the K-1 is incorrect, however, the appropriate response is to investigate the partnership’s return and pursue correction or the applicable inconsistency procedures rather than simply ignoring the form.

Does phantom income increase my basis in the hedge fund?

Generally, a partner’s distributive share of taxable partnership income increases outside basis under I.R.C. § 705, subject to the detailed Subchapter K rules.

This is one reason a proper outside-basis schedule is essential. The IRS specifically cautions that the K-1 capital-account information alone cannot be used to determine adjusted outside basis.

Can a hedge fund legally retain cash after allocating taxable income to investors?

Yes; partnership taxation generally does not require a cash distribution merely because taxable income has been allocated to a partner.

Whether the fund is required to make tax distributions depends on the partnership agreement and other governing documents, not merely on the fact that the investor has taxable income.

What should I do if my hedge-fund K-1 appears wrong?

First reconcile the K-1 to the partnership return, partnership agreement, prior-year K-1s, capital account, outside basis, and actual distributions before filing or changing the reported amount.

A partner’s return generally must be consistent with the partnership’s return, subject to the statutory and regulatory procedures for reporting inconsistencies.

Conclusion

Phantom income is a predictable consequence of partnership taxation, not an error simply because cash was not distributed; the critical question is whether the partnership’s taxable income was properly allocated to the investor under Subchapter K and the governing partnership agreement.

For sophisticated hedge-fund investors, the most important distinction is between:

• taxable income;
• cash received;
• partnership capital;
• outside tax basis; and
• economic value.

These amounts can differ substantially.

A high-net-worth taxpayer should therefore avoid using cash distributions as the sole measure of taxable income. Instead, the taxpayer and tax professional should reconcile the complete partnership-tax reporting chain.

The most important primary authorities are I.R.C. §§ 702, 704, 705, 706, and 731–733, together with the applicable Treasury regulations and judicial authorities.

The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Basye, 410 U.S. 441 (1973) is particularly instructive because the Court recognized that restrictions on actual receipt do not necessarily prevent partnership income from being taxable to the partners to whom the income is properly attributable.

The practical implication is simple:

A hedge-fund investor can have a tax bill without receiving the cash necessary to pay that bill.

That is the central phantom-income problem.

Limitations: Federal partnership taxation is highly fact-specific. Partnership agreements, allocation provisions, basis adjustments, tiered partnerships, distributions, redemptions, state taxation, foreign investments, carried interests, and subsequent amendments to partnership returns can materially change the result. Current law and administrative guidance should be verified for the applicable tax year before a filing or planning decision is made.

Author Bio

Alan Goldstein is an Enrolled Agent and researcher with 26 years of experience in federal and state tax controversy. He advises high-net-worth families and closely held businesses on income-shifting strategies, charitable planning, and IRS audit defense.

THIS ARTICLE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE. THE INFORMATION MAY BE OUTDATED AND YOU ARE NOT TO RELY ON IT. CONTACT YOUR PROFESSIONAL TO GUIDE YOU BASED ON YOUR CURRENT SITUATION, OR WHAT MAY APPLY TO PREVIOUS YEARS. THIS ARTICLE IS ONLY MEANT TO PROVIDE GENERAL INFORMATION AND NOT A SPECIFIC ANSWER. YOU ARE NOT OUR CLIENT AND WE HAVE NOT ADVISED YOU.

Schema Markup

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@graph": [
    {
      "@type": "Article",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#article",
      "headline": "Phantom Income from Hedge Funds and K-1s: What HNWIs Must Report but Never Receive",
      "description": "Phantom income from hedge funds and K-1s can create tax without cash distributions. This article explains the partnership allocation, reporting, basis, and authority rules.",
      "datePublished": "2026-10-05",
      "dateModified": "2026-10-05",
      "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Alan Goldstein"
      },
      "publisher": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Alan Goldstein & Associates"
      },
      "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1"
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "FAQPage",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#faq",
      "mainEntity": [
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "Why do I owe tax on a hedge-fund K-1 when I never received the money?",
          "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "You may owe tax because partnership law generally taxes your distributive share of partnership income whether or not the partnership distributed the corresponding cash."
          }
        },
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "Can I ignore a K-1 if the hedge fund did not distribute cash?",
          "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "No. Lack of a cash distribution generally does not eliminate the requirement to report a valid distributive share shown on the K-1."
          }
        },
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "Does phantom income increase my basis in the hedge fund?",
          "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Generally, a partner's distributive share of taxable partnership income increases outside basis under Internal Revenue Code section 705, subject to detailed Subchapter K rules."
          }
        },
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "Can a hedge fund legally retain cash after allocating taxable income to investors?",
          "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Yes. Partnership taxation generally does not require a cash distribution merely because taxable income has been allocated to a partner."
          }
        },
        {
          "@type": "Question",
          "name": "What should I do if my hedge-fund K-1 appears wrong?",
          "acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "First reconcile the K-1 to the partnership return, partnership agreement, prior-year K-1s, capital account, outside basis, and actual distributions before filing or changing the reported amount."
          }
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "@type": "Legislation",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#irc702",
      "name": "Internal Revenue Code Section 702",
      "url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/702"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Legislation",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#irc704",
      "name": "Internal Revenue Code Section 704",
      "url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/704"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Legislation",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#irc705",
      "name": "Internal Revenue Code Section 705",
      "url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/705"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Legislation",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#irc706",
      "name": "Internal Revenue Code Section 706",
      "url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/706"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Legislation",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#irc731",
      "name": "Internal Revenue Code Section 731",
      "url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/731"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Legislation",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#irc732",
      "name": "Internal Revenue Code Section 732",
      "url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/732"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Legislation",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#irc733",
      "name": "Internal Revenue Code Section 733",
      "url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/733"
    },
    {
      "@type": "Legislation",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#irc1061",
      "name": "Internal Revenue Code Section 1061",
      "url": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1061"
    },
    {
      "@type": "GovernmentService",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#form1065",
      "name": "IRS Form 1065",
      "url": "https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-1065"
    },
    {
      "@type": "GovernmentService",
      "@id": "https://taxplan.tax/phantom-income-hedge-funds-k1#schedulek1",
      "name": "IRS Schedule K-1 (Form 1065)",
      "url": "https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i1065sk1"
    }
  ]
}