In 1995, the Third Circuit decided a case that seems almost absurd: a professional musician bought a 17th-century bass viol for $28,000, used it in his work with the Philadelphia Orchestra, and claimed a depreciation deduction. The IRS argued the viol was a work of art with an indeterminable useful life – not depreciable. The court disagreed, and in doing so, explained how Congress transformed depreciation from a fact-intensive inquiry into a system of statutory cost recovery.
The Facts of Liddle
Brian Liddle, a professional bassist, purchased a Francesco Ruggeri bass viol (circa 1620-1695) for $28,000 in 1984. He used the instrument as his principal tool of trade, practicing up to 7½ hours per day, transporting it to rehearsals and performances.
Over time, the instrument suffered normal wear and tear: nicks, cracks, resin accumulation. The neck began to pull away from the body, requiring repair. Eventually, the tonal quality deteriorated so much that Liddle traded the bass for a different instrument in 1991.
In 1987, Liddle claimed an ACRS depreciation deduction of $3,170 for the Ruggeri bass. The IRS disallowed the deduction, arguing the bass would appreciate in value (not depreciate) and therefore was not depreciable.
The Old Rule: Section 167 and Determinate Useful Life
Before 1981, Section 167 governed depreciation. To claim a deduction, a taxpayer had to prove that the asset had a “determinable useful life” – the period over which the asset could reasonably be expected to be useful to the taxpayer in their trade or business. The regulations under Section 1.167(a)-1 provided a system of asset depreciation ranges (ADR) with guideline lives.
Works of art generally did not have determinable useful lives. In Harrah’s Club v. United States, 661 F.2d 203 (1981), the court held that antique automobiles displayed in a museum could not be depreciated because they did not suffer from exhaustion, wear and tear, or obsolescence. The IRS applied the same reasoning to musical instruments.
The 1981 Revolution: ACRS and MACRS
Congress enacted the Accelerated Cost Recovery System (ACRS) in the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, codified at Section 168. The legislative purpose was to “de-emphasize the concept of useful life, minimize the number of elections and exceptions and [be] easier to comply with and to administer.” The system was mandatory for property placed in service after 1980 and before 1987.
Under ACRS, property was assigned to one of four recovery periods (3, 5, 10, or 15 years) generally unrelated to the property’s actual useful life. Taxpayers recovered their entire cost over the statutory period – salvage value was ignored. The concept of “recovery property” replaced the old “depreciable property.”
In 1986, Congress replaced ACRS with the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS), which remains in effect today. Property is classified into 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, or 20-year classes based on its “class life.” Section 168(e)(1) refers to the old ADR class lives (the “revenue procedure” lives) to determine the classification. For property with no class life, the default is 7-year property. Section 168(e)(3)(C)(v).
The Liddle Court’s Analysis
The IRS argued that Section 168 incorporated the pre-1981 requirement that property have a determinable useful life, because Section 168(c)(1) defined “recovery property” as “tangible property of a character subject to the allowance for depreciation.”
The Third Circuit rejected this argument. Congress intended Section 168 to replace – not incorporate – the old rules. “We hold that ‘property of a character subject to the allowance for depreciation’ refers to property that is subject to exhaustion, wear and tear, and obsolescence.” The physical condition of Liddle’s bass – its nicks, cracks, and tonal deterioration – proved it was subject to wear and tear. That was sufficient.
The court also rejected the “work of art” argument. “In Brian Liddle’s professional hands, his bass viol was a tool of his trade, not a work of art. It was as valuable as the sound it could produce, and not for its looks.”
The Second Circuit Follows: Simon v. Commissioner
In Simon v. Commissioner, 68 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 1995), nonacq., 1996-2 C.B. 1, the Second Circuit reached the same result for a violin bow. The cost recovery system applies to any tangible property used in a trade or business, without regard to whether the property might appreciate in value. Fribourg Navigation Co. v. Commissioner, 383 U.S. 272 (1966), had already established that depreciation is “a process of estimated allocation which does not take account of fluctuations in valuation through market appreciation.”
How MACRS Works Today
Property subject to MACRS is assigned a recovery period based on its classification:
- 3-year property: Certain short-lived assets (e.g., tractors, racehorses over 2 years old)
- 5-year property: Automobiles, light trucks, computers, office machinery
- 7-year property: Office furniture, fixtures, most machinery
- 10-year property: Certain vessels, single-purpose agricultural structures
- 15-year property: Certain land improvements (fences, sidewalks, roads)
- 20-year property: Farm buildings
Real property has its own rules: residential rental property is depreciated over 27.5 years; nonresidential real property over 39 years.
Depreciation Methods and Conventions
MACRS generally uses the 200% declining balance method for 3, 5, 7, and 10-year property, switching to straight-line when that yields a larger deduction. For 15 and 20-year property, the 150% declining balance method applies. Real property uses straight-line.
Conventions determine when the depreciation deduction begins and ends. The half-year convention treats all property placed in service during the year as placed in service at mid-year. The mid-month convention applies to real property. If more than 40% of the year’s MACRS property is placed in service in the last three months, the mid-quarter convention applies.
Section 179: Expensing Instead of Depreciating
For small businesses, Section 179 allows an election to expense (deduct immediately) the cost of qualifying property, up to indexed limits (for 2023, $1,160,000, with phase-out beginning at $2,890,000). This is a powerful tool for accelerating deductions.
Section 179 property includes tangible personal property purchased for use in the active conduct of a trade or business. For tax years 2018 through 2025, qualified real property (certain improvements to nonresidential real property) also qualifies.
The IRS’s Loss
The IRS initially disagreed with Liddle and Simon, issuing a non-acquiescence. But the cases represent the clear majority view today. Musical instruments used by professional musicians are depreciable under MACRS as 7-year property (the default class). Of course, an amateur musician who buys a valuable violin for personal enjoyment cannot depreciate it – Section 262 disallows personal expenses. But for professionals, the cost recovery system applies, and Liddle shows that even a 300-year-old instrument suffers enough wear and tear to qualify.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Tax laws, judicial interpretations, and IRS guidance are subject to change at any time through legislation, regulation, or court decision. Readers should consult Alan Goldstein & Associates for advice regarding their specific factual situations.
Was this helpful?
0 / 0